[personal profile] mprotsenko
Over the last year I had a number of discussions - how healthcare should (or should not be) just, how people should (or should not) be penalized for bad choices, how interests of healthy people with jobs may (or may not) be more important than of those who are sick and cannot work.

Now we are facing an interesting situation - there is a potential epidemic disease that can kill a lot of (affluent) elderly people while younger ones will do mostly fine.

No high-tech treatment or bleeding edge diagnostic equipment like 10.5 Tesla MRI machines seems to make a difference - but a simple and cheap universal testing does.

However, over past years, we saw deliberate efforts to deny medical care to different groups of people. E.g., if you're a poor immigrant, you are incentivized to avoid getting subsidized healthcare (unless you're willing to risk your naturalization/permanent resident status). So no universal testing, sorry folks.

What do you think, will those conservative elderly people change their minds even as the policies they were rooting for - threaten their very lives? (And will continue to do so - COVID-19 is not the only infectious disease we are going to face.) Will they say: "Oh, now I see, when it comes to infections, universal healthcare helps everybody even if it is not just - let's implement it, it will save OUR LIVES"?

I am not holding my breath - but maybe I am wrong. What do you think?

Profile

mykyta_p

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516 17181920
21222324252627
2829 30    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags